[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131115120329.GH2965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:03:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf record: Add an option to force per-cpu mmaps
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:56:29PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So, here's the current status quo, there's 4 basic types of profiling
> that 99% of the people are using, in order of popularity:
>
> perf record <cmd>
> perf record -a sleep N
> perf record -p <PID>
> perf record -t <TID>
>
> The first two (which I'd guess comprise about 95% of real-world usage)
> have inheritance enabled.
>
> The last two (-p/-t) have inheritance disabled by default.
Yes, and I would expect it to be disabled for the TID option as you
explicitly select a single threads.
For the process wide thing it would make sense to enable inheritance by
default though.
So the big trade-off is that for single threaded processes which do not
fork you now have a single buffer, whereas with the inheritance option
you'll end up with nr_cpus buffers by default.
I suppose for most normal people that's not really an issue; and I
suppose all people with silly large machines already pay extra attention
-- but at least make it explicit and very clear that this is so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists