| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201311151459.00293.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:58:59 +0100 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, neilb@...e.de, hns@...delico.com, rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, rob@...dley.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] misc: bmp085: Add missing platform data. On Thursday 14 November 2013, Marek Belisko wrote: > DT bindings contains more parameters to set so add them to platform data also > to have possibility to use on arch where DT isn't available yet. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com> Can you give an example of a platform that uses this chip and cannot yet use DT in the mainline kernel? If it's only for out-of-tree platforms, I'd prefer to leave this patch out of tree as well and put the burden on whoever maintains a non-DT platform in a private kernel. > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/bmp085.h b/include/linux/i2c/bmp085.h > index b66cb98..addb972 100644 > --- a/include/linux/i2c/bmp085.h > +++ b/include/linux/i2c/bmp085.h Shouldn't this be in include/linux/platform_data? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists