linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131115143254.GA7079@tuxdriver.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:32:55 -0500
From:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate
 structure

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:22:18PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org> [131114 15:04]:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51:33AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > If this is not going into v3.13, these will cause conflicts
> > > with the mach-omap2/board-*.c files for v3.14.
> > > 
> > > So it might be best to do a minimal header patch first that
> > > can be merged in by both linux-omap and wireless trees.
> > 
> > I guess this patch is pretty minimal. It also seems to be acked by
> > the involved Maintainers, so maybe just merge Patch 1 without the
> > other patches?
> > 
> > This does not solve the problem with the struct modification from
> > the second patch, but I guess it's the more intrusive patch.
> 
> Once at least the first two patches are ready, how about I queue
> them after -rc1 and set up an immutable branch that can be merged
> in by linux-omap tree and the wireless tree?

That sounds reasonable to me.

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/