linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the idle tree with the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:22:45 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the idle tree with the pm tree

On Friday, November 15, 2013 12:23:29 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Len,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the idle tree got a conflict in
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c between commit fab04b2208dd ("intel_idle:
> Support Intel Atom Processor C2000 Product Family") from the pm tree and
> commit 0654c50d7a0b ("intel_idle: Support Intel Atom Processor C2000
> Product Family") from the idle tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the version from the pm tree since it was much
> newer) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

Thanks for fixing this up!

Rafael

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)