lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:54:58 +0100
From:	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, roy.franz@...aro.org,
	msalter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm: [U]EFI runtime services support

Hi Olof,

Many thanks for having a look.

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:04:22AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> This series is generally looking sane to me without looking at the
> code in very close detail.

In the interest of full disclosure, I would like to point out that I
will be posting another version next week, based on the output of the
discussions around the DT bindings and documentation.
 
This set needs to be tested in combination with Roy's UEFI stub patches
is recommended, as this is the intended boot mechanism on UEFI
platforms. https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/EFIstub

> Do you have a test setup that you've been using for this that you
> could give a pointer to?

Well, I have been using vexpress ca9 and ca15_a7 (TC2), or the ARM
commercial software models (RTSM) of the same. I have also tested on
Arndale, but I don't know if that is fully supported by mainline yet.

Prebuilt UEFI images are available from
http://releases.linaro.org/13.09/components/kernel/uefi-linaro

efibootmgr is probably the best utility to test the runtime services,
if scanning the /sys entries are not sufficient. It builds for armhf
without modification.

/
    Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ