[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVOeDmdKMgnuV1kt6_aEbLG9aNKcRJqoL61pUzermMDbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:43:12 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: jerry.hoemann@...com
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"list@...ederm.org:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@...ederm.org:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Early use of boot service memory
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:55 PM, <jerry.hoemann@...com> wrote:
>> You may need bunch of PCIe cards installed.
>>
>> The system with 6TiB + 16 PCIe cards, second kernel OOM.
>> The system with 4.5TiB + 16 PCIe cards, second kernel works with vmcore dumped.
>
> Yinghai,
>
> Your original email said you were using "legacy mode". Does this mean
> you're not running makedumpfile in cyclic mode? Cyclic mode makes
> a *big* difference in memory foot print of makedumpfile.
I mean: boot linux with legacy bios mode instead UEFI native boot.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists