[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1384568535-26611-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:22:15 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
CC: <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ceh@...com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use a sane boot frequency when booting with a mismatched bootloader configuration
On many development platforms, at boot, the bootloader configured
frequency maynot match the valid frequencies that are stated to be
supported in OPP table. This may occur due to various reasons:
a) older or default bootloader in development platform without latest
updates
b) SoC documentation update that may have occurred in kernel
c) kernel definitions are out of date Vs bootloader which is updated
etc..
In these cases, we should assume from a kernel perspective, the only
safe frequency that the system can be on is the ones available in the
OPP table. This may not handle case (c), but, that is a different
kernel bug of it's own.
Considering that in many existing or development platforms, (a) or
(b) is common, enforce a sanity check and reprogram to a conservative
start configuration at probe to allow sane operation independent of
bootloader.
Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
---
based on v3.12 tag - however, a rebase with opp function name change
is needed for v3.13-rc1 if folks are ok, I can repost with updates.
Identified when during debug of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3191411/
on TI vendor kernel based on v3.12 tag.
In the case discussed, bootloader booted OMAP5uEVM at 1.1GHz when the available
frequencies were 500MHz, 1GHz, 1.5GHz.
To prevent system from functioning at this invalid configuration (and hence
trigger the bug seen in stats), we should remove the dependence of the kernel
from bootloader configuration.
With this patch, in the mentioned boot scenario, we get the following log:
[ 25.649736] cpufreq_cpu0: bootloader freq 1100000000 no match to table, Using 1000000000
Artificially modifying the bootloader to create other boundary conditions:
(lower bound check)
[ 25.633535] cpufreq_cpu0: bootloader freq 300000000Hz no match to table, Using 500000000Hz
(upper bound check)
[ 27.355837] cpufreq_cpu0: bootloader freq 1600000000Hz no match to table, Using 1500000000Hz
The other alternative(to reduce code churn) would be to just report a
mismatch and continue to function at the potentially risky OPP - but
in the cases such as using userspace governor, the system could be in
unstable state resulting in hard to debug behavior.
The last alternative is to always expect bootloader to be in sync with proper
OPP configuration, which rarely happens correctly.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index c522a95..9765050 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpu0_cpufreq_driver = {
static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *np;
- int ret;
+ int ret, i;
+ long boot_freq;
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
if (!cpu_dev) {
@@ -232,7 +233,6 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long min_uV, max_uV;
- int i;
/*
* OPP is maintained in order of increasing frequency, and
@@ -254,6 +254,86 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
transition_latency += ret * 1000;
}
+ boot_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk);
+
+ /* See if we have a perfect match */
+ for (i = 0; freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++)
+ if (boot_freq == freq_table[i].frequency * 1000)
+ break;
+
+ /* If we have a bad bootloader config, try recovery */
+ if (freq_table[i].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
+ struct opp *opp;
+ long new_freq = boot_freq, freq_exact;
+ unsigned long volt = 0, tol = 0;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ /* Try a conservative match */
+ opp = opp_find_freq_floor(cpu_dev, &new_freq);
+
+ /* If we did not get a floor match, try least available freq */
+ if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
+ new_freq = freq_table[0].frequency * 1000;
+ opp = opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev, new_freq, true);
+ }
+ if (IS_ERR(opp))
+ ret = -ERANGE;
+ if (!IS_ERR(opp) && !IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
+ volt = opp_get_voltage(opp);
+ tol = volt * voltage_tolerance / 100;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Fail to find match boot clock rate: %lu\n",
+ boot_freq);
+ goto out_free_table;
+ }
+
+ /* We dont expect to endup with same result */
+ WARN_ON(boot_freq == new_freq);
+
+ freq_exact = clk_round_rate(cpu_clk, new_freq);
+ if (freq_exact < 0) {
+ pr_err("Fail to find valid boot clock rate: %lu\n",
+ freq_exact);
+ goto out_free_table;
+ }
+
+ /* Warn to get developer to fix bootloader */
+ pr_err("Bootloader freq %luHz no match to table, Using %luHz\n",
+ boot_freq, new_freq);
+
+ /*
+ * For voltage sequencing we *assume* that bootloader has at
+ * least set the voltage appropriate for the boot_frequency
+ */
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && boot_freq < new_freq) {
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Fail to scale boot voltage up: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ goto out_free_table;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, freq_exact);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Fail to set boot clock rate: %d\n", ret);
+ goto out_free_table;
+ }
+
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg) && boot_freq > new_freq) {
+ ret = regulator_set_voltage_tol(cpu_reg, volt, tol);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Fail to scale boot voltage down: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ goto out_free_table;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpu0_cpufreq_driver);
if (ret) {
pr_err("failed register driver: %d\n", ret);
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists