linux-kernel - Re: [ 146/184] softirq: reduce latencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131116075557.GE11858@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:55:57 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [ 146/184] softirq: reduce latencies

Hi Li,

I just found your mail unread in my box by pure luck, I'm sorry.

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:14:13PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Cc: Ben Greear
> Cc: Tejun
> 
> Hi Willy,
> 
> This patch introduced a bug, which was then fixed by commit 34376a50fb1f
> ("Fix lockup related to stop_machine being stuck in __do_softirq."),
> do we need this fix for 2.6.32 ?

Yes, I just checked the code and in doubt I think it's safer to apply it
as well. So I'm queuing the fix for .62, thanks !

Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/