[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdvfABJ5C9M4F_RbfGfR5cp8xROzRTCgtkMUvUxoHXS0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:39:43 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Florian Meier <florian.meier@...lo.de>,
"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] dmaengine: Add support for BCM2835
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:43:45PM +0000, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
>>
>> > > +module_platform_driver(bcm2835_dma_driver);
>> >
>> > Is it possible to get driver initialized after that one that uses it?
>>
>> Doesn't quite make sense. If you're asking whether other drivers can
>> try to make use of this driver before it's initialised, then the answer
>> is no. We have mechanisms to cope with that - see deferred probing.
The reason why I was asking about I'm just wondering what we have to
do with existing drivers. Shall we convert them to be initialized as
normal platform drivers instead of subsys_initcall?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists