[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABDT8WzUoPmPzDnjD3w+Oj=jUVcMf91+toWDS+hK6CrXLveCFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:11:10 +0100
From: Florian Meier <florian.meier@...lo.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Fallback to of_node of parent
Ok, I will try to find all relevant lines.
Where is the best place to document this?
Greetings,
Florian
2013/11/16 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
>
>> + if (!dev->of_node && dev->parent)
>> + dev->of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
>> +
>
> That is not enough. Current drivers could then have the assignment
> removed and even more important, this behaviour should be documented.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists