linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] cmdline: declare exported symbols immediately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMP44s2URjS9ESbNrMDdQvAs6tWHPF4brm9hOMSTfGjRwkkR3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:27:56 -0600
From:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To:	Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cmdline: declare exported symbols immediately

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com> wrote:
> 2013-11-16 18:32 keltezéssel, Felipe Contreras írta:
>> WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(memparse);
>>
>> WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_option);
>>
>> WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_options);
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/cmdline.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/cmdline.c b/lib/cmdline.c
>> index 5466333..d4932f7 100644
>> --- a/lib/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/lib/cmdline.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ int get_option(char **str, int *pint)
>>
>>       return 1;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_option);
>>
>>  /**
>>   *   get_options - Parse a string into a list of integers
>> @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int nints, int *ints)
>>       ints[0] = i - 1;
>>       return (char *)str;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_options);
>>
>>  /**
>>   *   memparse - parse a string with mem suffixes into a number
>> @@ -152,7 +154,4 @@ unsigned long long memparse(const char *ptr, char **retptr)
>>
>>       return ret;
>>  }
>> -
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(memparse);
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_option);
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_options);
>>
>
> I don't know about this one, but I have seen lots of files where EXPORT_SYMBOLs were
> listed at the end of the file. To avoid misunderstanding, I still think that having the
> exports after the function is more appropriate.

If that was appropriate then checkpatch should be updated to remove
that warning, but presumably it's desirable to have them one next to
the other.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/