[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384561418-30575-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:23:32 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/16] rcu: Provide better diagnostics for blocking in RCU callback functions
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Currently blocking in an RCU callback function will result in
"scheduling while atomic", which could be triggered for any number
of reasons. To aid debugging, this patch introduces a rcu_callback_map
that is used to tie the inappropriate voluntary context switch back
to the fact that the function is being invoked from within a callback.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 +
kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 3 +++
kernel/rcu/update.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 39cbb889e20d..a94a5805d378 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_callback_map;
extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
/**
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 7859a0a3951e..a8f981a2d110 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -102,13 +102,16 @@ static inline bool __rcu_reclaim(const char *rn, struct rcu_head *head)
{
unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)head->func;
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
if (__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset)) {
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_callback(rn, head, offset));
kfree((void *)head - offset);
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
return 1;
} else {
RCU_TRACE(trace_rcu_invoke_callback(rn, head));
head->func(head);
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
return 0;
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index 6cb3dff89e2b..802365ccd591 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map =
STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_read_lock_sched", &rcu_sched_lock_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_sched_lock_map);
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_callback_key;
+struct lockdep_map rcu_callback_map =
+ STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_callback", &rcu_callback_key);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_callback_map);
+
int notrace debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
{
return rcu_scheduler_active && debug_locks &&
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists