[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131117094320.GN16796@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:43:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: perf/tracepoint: another fuzzer generated lockup
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 04:53:59PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Agreed.
> FYI, kprobes has a recursion detection counter and it is reported via
> debugfs/tracing/kprobe_profile :)
Perf also has a recursion counter (4 actually, not reported to
userspace), but the problem with the irq_work_exit thing is that its a
non-recursive event loop, so recursion checks don't actually work to
catch it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists