[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528A1444.8020802@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:21:08 +0200
From: "ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>, <wim@...ana.be>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<swarren@...dotorg.org>, <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: davinci: add GET_TIMELEFT option support
On 11/17/2013 04:22 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 03:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>> Currently, the davinci watchdog can be read while counting,
>> so we can add ability to report the remaining time before
>> the system will reboot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c
>> index 1fc2093..6cbf2e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c
>> @@ -117,6 +117,33 @@ static int davinci_wdt_ping(struct
>> watchdog_device *wdd)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned int davinci_wdt_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device
>> *wdd)
>> +{
>> + u64 timer_counter;
>> + unsigned long freq;
>> + u32 val;
>> + struct davinci_wdt_device *davinci_wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>> +
>> + /* if timeout is occured then return 0 */
>
> is -> has ?
>
Yes
>> + val = ioread32(davinci_wdt->base + WDTCR);
>> + if (val & WDFLAG)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + freq = clk_get_rate(davinci_wdt->clk);
>> +
>> + if (!freq) {
>> + dev_err(wdd->dev, "clock freq is not set\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
> This error check doesn't make sense to me; elsewhere the clock rate is
> not validated.
> I would suggest to just return 0 here.
>
Agree
>> + timer_counter = ioread32(davinci_wdt->base + TIM12);
>> + timer_counter |= ((u64)ioread32(davinci_wdt->base + TIM34) << 32);
>> +
>> + do_div(timer_counter, freq);
>> +
>> + return wdd->timeout - timer_counter;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct watchdog_info davinci_wdt_info = {
>> .options = WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING,
>> .identity = "DaVinci Watchdog",
>> @@ -127,6 +154,7 @@ static const struct watchdog_ops davinci_wdt_ops = {
>> .start = davinci_wdt_start,
>> .stop = davinci_wdt_ping,
>> .ping = davinci_wdt_ping,
>> + .get_timeleft = davinci_wdt_get_timeleft,
>> };
>>
>> static int davinci_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists