[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131118023443.GN13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 02:34:43 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Greg Price <price@....EDU>, Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2 <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify error on directive in macro arguments (Re:
[PATCH] jffs2: fix sparse errors: directive in argument list)
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 06:15:32PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > sparse matches gcc behaviour (I hope), but it warns about such abuses.
> > > It's a defect, all right - one being reported by sparse.
> >
> > Perhaps the following tweak to the error message would make this
> > subtlety clearer?
>
> Maybe, but this case isn't a macro. It's a function.
> Dunno if differentiating when it's a macro or a
> function is difficult though.
In which case? With printk() it's perfectly fine and sparse
will not complain at all. With pr_info(), OTOH, we have
#define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
and when you start playing that kind of games with it, you get warnings.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists