lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:56:33 +0100
From:	Florian Meier <florian.meier@...lo.de>
To:	"Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
CC:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] ASoC: Add support for BCM2835

>> +static int bcm2835_i2s_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>> +				 struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>> +				 struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
>> +{
>> +	struct bcm2835_i2s_dev *dev = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(dai);
>> +
>> +	unsigned int sampling_rate = params_rate(params);
>> +	unsigned int data_length, data_delay, bclk_ratio;
>> +	unsigned int ch1pos, ch2pos, mode, format;
>> +	unsigned int mash = BCM2835_CLK_MASH_1;
>> +	unsigned int divi, divf, target_frequency;
>> +	int clk_src = -1;
>> +	unsigned int master = dev->fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_MASTER_MASK;
>> +	uint32_t bit_master =	(master == SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS
>> +					|| master == SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFM);
>> +
>> +	uint32_t frame_master =	(master == SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS
> 
> So, if master == SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS both bit_master and frame_master
> will be true. Is it correct?

Yes. That is exactly what CBS_CFS expresses:
Codec Bit Slave and Codec Frame Slave
So the interface is bit master as well as frame master.
Did I miss anything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists