lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131118162532.GB15610@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:25:32 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com, ian.campbell@...rix.com,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, rui.zhang@...el.com, wni@...dia.com,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, durgadoss.r@...el.com,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 06/20] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On 15-11-2013 03:43, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo,
> > 
> 
> Hello Jean!
> 
> > Sorry for joining the discussion a little late, I could never find the
> > time to look into this patch series so far.
> 
> Well, better late than never, that's what it is said, isn't it? :-)
> Thanks for arranging the time to look at these patches.
> 
> The patch series have been looked and contributed by several people and
> a couple o maintainers now. Starts to be way better than the original
> RFC. The core idea still holds though.
> 
> > 
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:46:08 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
> >> to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
> >> thermal framework.
> >>
> >> The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
> >> describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
> >> inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
> >> will be the same.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
> >> Cc: lm-sensors@...sensors.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> On HWMON side, I got Guenter's solid contributions, as you can see.
> 
Not an argument. I am not perfect, and Jean has a number of valid points.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ