[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1384798205.1791.14.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:10:05 -0700
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal
On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 00:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled,
> the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the
> root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef78cd
> (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines). However, that
> check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject()
> users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same
> check by themselves before executing that function.
>
> For this reason, remove the scan handler check from
> acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work
> again.
I am curious why the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set
hotplug.enabled. Is this how it disables hotplug via sysfs eject but
enables via ACPI notification?
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists