[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2863850.GcQ0l6lPBj@mistral>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:01:11 -0800
From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@....net>
To: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
"open list:SECURE DIGITAL HO..." <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Avoid needless loop while handling SDIO interrupts in sdhci_irq()
[yet another patch ping]
On Tuesday, November 05, 2013 07:40:36 PM Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Ignore Card Interrupt bit in the interrupt status if we already know that
> mmc_signal_sdio_irq() is going to be called at the end of sdhci_irq(). This
> avoids a needless loop in sdhci_irq() repeatedly reading interrupt status
> and doing nothing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@....net>
> Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 7a7fb4f..a83cd1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2491,6 +2491,14 @@ again:
> result = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> intmask = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
> +
> + /*
> + * If we know we'll call the driver to signal SDIO IRQ, disregard
> + * further indications of Card Interrupt in the status to avoid a
> + * needless loop.
> + */
> + if (cardint)
> + intmask &= ~SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
> if (intmask && --max_loops)
> goto again;
> out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists