linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:13:27 -0700
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal

On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 22:39 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:10:05 AM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 00:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled,
> > > the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the
> > > root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef78cd
> > > (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines).  However, that
> > > check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject()
> > > users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same
> > > check by themselves before executing that function.
> > > 
> > > For this reason, remove the scan handler check from
> > > acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work
> > > again.
> > 
> > I am curious why the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set
> > hotplug.enabled.  Is this how it disables hotplug via sysfs eject but
> > enables via ACPI notification? 
> 
> It just doesn't register for hotplug at all.  I guess it could set that
> bit alone, but then it would be quite confusing and the check is not
> necessary anyway.

I see.  Given how the PCI host bridge scan handler is integrated today,
the change looks reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/