[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131118233028.GB27541@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:30:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Check for function declarations without
arguments
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:23:01PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Functions like this one are evil:
>
> void foo()
> {
> ...
> }
>
> Because these functions allow variadic arguments without
> checking the arguments at all.
>
> Original-patch-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 61090e0..2e1ff0c 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2634,6 +2634,15 @@ sub process {
> $herecurr);
> }
>
> +# check for function declarations without arguments like "int foo()"
> + if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> + if (ERROR("FUNCTION_WITHOUT_ARGS",
> + "Bad function definition - $1() should probably be $1(void)\n" . $herecurr) &&
I liked the nice preaching comment better - this one is boring.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists