lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 07:54:43 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf record: mmap output file - v5 * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote: > > Well, with 1 khz sampling of a single threaded workload it's 8MB > > per second - that's 80 MB for 10 seconds profiling - not the end > > of the world. > > We now use 4 khz sampling frequency by default, just FYI. :) Yes, but if someone samples with 1 khz that's still plenty enough for a long enough run. With 4k sampling you coul do 2.5 seconds of profiling and still have 80 MB of data :-) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists