linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: gpiolib: document new interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 10:32:54 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: gpiolib: document new interface

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
> On 11/18/2013 06:34 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> Don't we need an 00-INDEX file?
>> (Maybe Rob can tell whether this is desirable.)
>
> Good idea. gpio.txt somehow fulfills that role, but it might be better if we
> split it. Would you like me to submit a new revision?

No please just send some incremental patch on top of
my "fixes" branch in the GPIO tree.

I've read through the docs and couldn't find anything
really wrong with it BTW.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/