| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131119113153.GD3694@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:31:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: shaohua.li@...el.com, rui.zhang@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines
People seem to delight in writing wrong and broken mwait idle routines;
collapse the lot.
This leaves mwait_play_dead() the sole remaining user of __mwait() and
new __mwait() users are probably doing it wrong.
Also remove __sti_mwait() as its unused.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
Mike, does this cure your core2?
arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 23 ---------------------
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 23 ---------------------
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 5 +----
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 15 --------------
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 8 +-------
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 4 +---
7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
index 2f366d0ac6b4..80014dade987 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_MWAIT_H
#define _ASM_X86_MWAIT_H
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
#define MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK 0xf
#define MWAIT_CSTATE_MASK 0xf
#define MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE 4
@@ -13,4 +15,44 @@
#define MWAIT_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK 0x1
+static inline void __monitor(const void *eax, unsigned long ecx,
+ unsigned long edx)
+{
+ /* "monitor %eax, %ecx, %edx;" */
+ asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc8;"
+ :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx), "d"(edx));
+}
+
+static inline void __mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
+{
+ /* "mwait %eax, %ecx;" */
+ asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc9;"
+ :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
+}
+
+/*
+ * This uses new MONITOR/MWAIT instructions on P4 processors with PNI,
+ * which can obviate IPI to trigger checking of need_resched.
+ * We execute MONITOR against need_resched and enter optimized wait state
+ * through MWAIT. Whenever someone changes need_resched, we would be woken
+ * up from MWAIT (without an IPI).
+ *
+ * New with Core Duo processors, MWAIT can take some hints based on CPU
+ * capability.
+ */
+static inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
+{
+ if (need_resched())
+ return;
+
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
+ clflush((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags);
+
+ __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
+ if (!current_set_polling_and_test())
+ __mwait(eax, ecx);
+
+ __current_clr_polling();
+}
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_MWAIT_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 7b034a4057f9..24821f5768bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -700,29 +700,6 @@ static inline void sync_core(void)
#endif
}
-static inline void __monitor(const void *eax, unsigned long ecx,
- unsigned long edx)
-{
- /* "monitor %eax, %ecx, %edx;" */
- asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc8;"
- :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx), "d"(edx));
-}
-
-static inline void __mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
-{
- /* "mwait %eax, %ecx;" */
- asm volatile(".byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc9;"
- :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
-}
-
-static inline void __sti_mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
-{
- trace_hardirqs_on();
- /* "mwait %eax, %ecx;" */
- asm volatile("sti; .byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc9;"
- :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
-}
-
extern void select_idle_routine(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
extern void init_amd_e400_c1e_mask(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
index d2b7f27781bc..e69182fd01cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
@@ -150,29 +150,6 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int cpu,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe);
-/*
- * This uses new MONITOR/MWAIT instructions on P4 processors with PNI,
- * which can obviate IPI to trigger checking of need_resched.
- * We execute MONITOR against need_resched and enter optimized wait state
- * through MWAIT. Whenever someone changes need_resched, we would be woken
- * up from MWAIT (without an IPI).
- *
- * New with Core Duo processors, MWAIT can take some hints based on CPU
- * capability.
- */
-void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long ax, unsigned long cx)
-{
- if (!need_resched()) {
- if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
- clflush((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags);
-
- __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
- smp_mb();
- if (!need_resched())
- __mwait(ax, cx);
- }
-}
-
void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
index fc6008fbce35..509452a62f96 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
@@ -193,10 +193,7 @@ static int power_saving_thread(void *data)
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu);
stop_critical_timings();
- __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
- smp_mb();
- if (!need_resched())
- __mwait(power_saving_mwait_eax, 1);
+ mwait_idle_with_hints(power_saving_mwait_eax, 1);
start_critical_timings();
if (lapic_marked_unstable)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 644516d9bde6..f90c56c8379e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -727,11 +727,6 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_c1(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
if (unlikely(!pr))
return -EINVAL;
- if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
- if (current_set_polling_and_test())
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
lapic_timer_state_broadcast(pr, cx, 1);
acpi_idle_do_entry(cx);
@@ -785,11 +780,6 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_simple(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
if (unlikely(!pr))
return -EINVAL;
- if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
- if (current_set_polling_and_test())
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/*
* Must be done before busmaster disable as we might need to
* access HPET !
@@ -841,11 +831,6 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
}
}
- if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_FFH) {
- if (current_set_polling_and_test())
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
acpi_unlazy_tlb(smp_processor_id());
/* Tell the scheduler that we are going deep-idle: */
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index 3226ce98fb18..3b56d76a5bca 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -359,13 +359,7 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu);
- if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
-
- __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
- smp_mb();
- if (!need_resched())
- __mwait(eax, ecx);
- }
+ mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &cpu);
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
index 8f181b3f842b..e8275f2df9af 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -438,9 +438,7 @@ static int clamp_thread(void *arg)
*/
local_touch_nmi();
stop_critical_timings();
- __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
- cpu_relax(); /* allow HT sibling to run */
- __mwait(eax, ecx);
+ mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
start_critical_timings();
atomic_inc(&idle_wakeup_counter);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists