[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131119131304.GC7263@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:13:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf record: mmap output file - v5
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:48:10PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > And that does indeed seem to side-step the perf sw pagefault event, but
> > that is arguably a perf bug.
>
> To clarify; mm/memory.c:handle_mm_fault() is where the VM counts its
> generic PGFAULT event, but our perf sw event is in the arch fault
> handler.
>
> So they count different but related things.
I think that assymetry was intended: we didn't want to count
'synchronous' pagefaults like get_user_pages() or mlock() bringing in
pages, only asynchronous/real ones, or so.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists