[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131119144642.GJ10022@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:46:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shaohua.li@...el.com,
rui.zhang@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:22:43AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> >index 8f181b3f842b..e8275f2df9af 100644
> >--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> >+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
> >@@ -438,9 +438,7 @@ static int clamp_thread(void *arg)
> > */
> > local_touch_nmi();
> > stop_critical_timings();
> >- __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
> >- cpu_relax(); /* allow HT sibling to run */
> >- __mwait(eax, ecx);
> >+ mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
> > start_critical_timings();
> > atomic_inc(&idle_wakeup_counter);
> > }
> >
>
> hmm I take it that mwait_idle_with_hints is the one that also checks need_resched() ?
> if so... powerclamp may not want to use that (the whole point is to NOT give the cpu
> to tasks!)
Of course, you're very much not getting something that wins from
stop_machine or a fifo-99 task.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists