[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31F406F20B26204E8066CA524505279A269C6840@DFLE12.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:53:22 +0000
From: "Cortes, Alexis" <alexis.cortes@...com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb: hub: Use correct reset for wedged USB3 devices
that are NOTATTACHED
Hi Sarah,
Sorry for my delayed response, I just saw your e-mail (it got filtered somehow). About your question: actually I'm not sure, I'll have to check that to confirm it. I'll get back to you with an answer as soon as I have it.
Best Regards,
Alexis Cortes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:31 PM
To: Alan Stern
Cc: Julius Werner; Greg Kroah-Hartman; LKML; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org; Benson Leung; Vincent Palatin; Cortes, Alexis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Use correct reset for wedged USB3 devices that are NOTATTACHED
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:32:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Julius Werner wrote:
>
> > > What if the device is in USB_STATE_SUSPENDED?
> >
> > I'm not sure that is possible at that point in hub_events(), I don't
> > know of a way that could lead to this situation. I could still add
> > the check just to be sure if you want it, though.
>
> I don't know either. But Sarah has said that ports can spontaneously
> go into Compliance Mode for no apparent reason. If that can happen,
> maybe it can happen while the port is in U3 and the device is
> suspended. In such cases, though, you'd need to do a reset-resume
> rather than a simple reset.
Looking at commits c3897aa5386faba77e5bbdf94902a1658d3a5b11 and 71c731a296f1b08a3724bd1b514b64f1bda87a23, it seems that the TI host controllers' ports can go into compliance mode only when a device is inserted. Once the device is link trained by the redriver, the port shouldn't go into compliance mode. So we should never see compliance mode on a port with an attached USB device in suspend.
Alex, can you confirm that the TI host's port won't go into compliance mode while a connected device is suspended?
> > > Not at all. If a device is unplugged, its state changes to
> > > NOTATTACHED before the driver is unbound. During that time, the
> > > driver will see all its URBs failing, so it may very well try to reset the device.
> > > (For example, usbhid behaves like this.) That isn't a bug.
> >
> > Oh, okay, I wasn't quite sure how that plays together. Would you
> > think it's still valuable to print it out (maybe as dev_info()
> > instead of
> > dev_warn()) instead of just silently ignoring the reset request? It
> > would have certainly been useful for me to find this problem faster,
> > but I can take it out again if you think it would result in too much
> > noise.
>
> I think keeping dev_dbg() is best. If you're searching for the
> solution to a problem, you should have debugging enabled and so you
> ought to see the message.
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists