linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] mfd: wm5110: Add register patch for rev D chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1384875366-2527-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:36:06 +0000
From:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc:	sameo@...ux.intel.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mfd: wm5110: Add register patch for rev D chip

Evaluation of revision D of WM5110 suggests updates to the register
patch for optimal performance. For the sake of clarity rev C of the chip
does not require a register patch.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---

Updated the commit message to give a little more info on
what the register patch is for.

As regards add #defines for the silicon revisions I am not
sure it adds a significant amount of extra clarity, is "case
A: case B:" really a lot clearer than "case 0: case 1:"
but that said I am happy to do a patch for this if we feel
strongly about it? Although I would suggest it should be
seperate from this patch.

Thanks,
Charles

 drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
index daf2fe8..bd9c3c9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
@@ -223,6 +223,31 @@ static const struct reg_default wm5110_revb_patch[] = {
 	{ 0x80, 0x0 },
 };
 
+static const struct reg_default wm5110_revd_patch[] = {
+	{ 0x80, 0x3 },
+	{ 0x80, 0x3 },
+	{ 0x393, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x394, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x395, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x396, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x397, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x398, 0x26 },
+	{ 0x221, 0x90 },
+	{ 0x211, 0x8 },
+	{ 0x36c, 0x1fb },
+	{ 0x26e, 0x64 },
+	{ 0x26f, 0xea },
+	{ 0x270, 0x1f16 },
+	{ 0x51b, 0x1 },
+	{ 0x55b, 0x1 },
+	{ 0x59b, 0x1 },
+	{ 0x4f0, 0x633 },
+	{ 0x441, 0xc059 },
+	{ 0x209, 0x27 },
+	{ 0x80, 0x0 },
+	{ 0x80, 0x0 },
+};
+
 /* We use a function so we can use ARRAY_SIZE() */
 int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 {
@@ -235,7 +260,10 @@ int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 		return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
 					     wm5110_revb_patch,
 					     ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revb_patch));
-
+	case 3:
+		return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
+					     wm5110_revd_patch,
+					     ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revd_patch));
 	default:
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/