linux-kernel - Multiple local register variables w/ same register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:56:57 +1000
From:	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
CC:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	lttng-dev@...ts.lttng.org, Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
	"gcc@....gnu.org" <gcc@....gnu.org>
Subject: Multiple local register variables w/ same register

On 11/20/2013 03:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:02:20PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Unfortunately I don't have a ARM cross-compiler setup ready. Nathan could test
>> it for us though.
>>
>> It might shuffle things around enough to work around the issue, but with the
>> approach you propose, I would be concerned about the compiler being within
>> its rights to reorder the code into the following sequence:
>>
>> struct thread_info *ptra, *ptrb;
>>
>> ptra = current_thread_info();
>> /*
>>  * each current_thread_info() would have a clobber on *sp, which orders
>>  * those two wrt each other.
>>   */
>> ptrb = current_thread_info();
>>
>> load from ptra->preempt_count;
>> /*
>>  * however, the following accesses that depend on ptra and ptrb could be
>>  * reordered if the compiler has no way to know that ptra and ptrb are
>>  * aliased.
>>  */
>> store to ptrb->preempt_count;
>>
>> One question that might be worth asking: with the local register variable
>> extension (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/Local-Reg-Vars.html#Local-Reg-Vars)
>> (thanks to Jakub for the pointer), should the compiler consider two variables
>> bound to the same register as being aliased or not ? AFAIU, local reg vars appear
>> to be architecture-specific, so maybe there is something fishy on ARM ?

It appears not:

int __attribute__((noinline)) f(void)
{
  {
    register int x __asm__("eax");
    x = 1;
  }
  {
    register int y __asm__("eax");
    return ++y;
  }
}

extern void abort(void);

int main(void)
{
  if (f() != 2)
    abort();
  return 0;
}

Anyone see anything wrong with the testcase?  Do we thing this sort of thing
ought to work, perhaps with scopes lengthened?


r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/