lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1384831096.26319.25.camel@kjgkr>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:18:16 +0900
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	谭姝 <shu.tan@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: split sbi->write_mutex for DATA/NODE/META
 to avoid unnecessary race

Hi,

2013-11-19 (화), 09:43 +0800, Chao Yu:
> All DATA/NODE/META bio buffers in superblock is protected by 
> 'sbi->write_mutex', but each bio buffer area is independent, So we 
> should split write_mutex to three for DATA/NODE/META.

Agreed, one comment below though.
Anyway I'll send v2.
Thanks, :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |    2 +-
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c |    8 ++++----
>  fs/f2fs/super.c   |    4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 2df1e61..1c67521 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>  	struct f2fs_sm_info *sm_info;		/* segment manager */
>  	struct bio *bio[NR_PAGE_TYPE];		/* bios to merge */
>  	sector_t last_block_in_bio[NR_PAGE_TYPE];	/* last block number */
> -	struct mutex write_mutex;		/* mutex for writing IOs */
> +	struct mutex write_mutex[NR_PAGE_TYPE];	/* mutex for writing IOs */
>  
>  	/* for checkpoint */
>  	struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt;		/* raw checkpoint pointer */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 556965f..a36713ae 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -661,9 +661,9 @@ void f2fs_submit_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, enum
> page_type type, bool sync)
>  	if (!sbi->bio[btype])
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&sbi->write_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&sbi->write_mutex[type]);

btype instead of type.

>  	do_submit_bio(sbi, type, sync);
> -	mutex_unlock(&sbi->write_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&sbi->write_mutex[type]);
>  }
>  
>  static void submit_write_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static void submit_write_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct page *page,
>  
>  	verify_block_addr(sbi, blk_addr);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&sbi->write_mutex);
> +	mutex_lock(&sbi->write_mutex[type]);
>  
>  	inc_page_count(sbi, F2FS_WRITEBACK);
>  
> @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ retry:
>  
>  	sbi->last_block_in_bio[type] = blk_addr;
>  
> -	mutex_unlock(&sbi->write_mutex);
> +	mutex_unlock(&sbi->write_mutex[type]);
>  	trace_f2fs_submit_write_page(page, blk_addr, type);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index f56941c..6928c0a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -874,7 +874,9 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void
> *data, int silent)
>  	mutex_init(&sbi->node_write);
>  	sbi->por_doing = false;
>  	spin_lock_init(&sbi->stat_lock);
> -	mutex_init(&sbi->write_mutex);
> +	mutex_init(&sbi->write_mutex[DATA]);
> +	mutex_init(&sbi->write_mutex[NODE]);
> +	mutex_init(&sbi->write_mutex[META]);
>  	init_rwsem(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&sbi->cp_wait);
>  	init_sb_info(sbi);

-- 
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ