linux-kernel - RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] f2fs: add a new function to support for merging contiguous read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <001b01cee5ba$46651330$d32f3990$@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:31:23 +0800
From:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To:	??? <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	谭姝 <shu.tan@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] f2fs: add a new function to
 support for merging contiguous read

Hi Kim,

No considering 80 columns for the description, :(
I will resend the patches.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chao Yu [mailto:chao2.yu@...sung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:55 PM
> To: ??? (jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com)
> Cc: 'linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org'; 'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'; 'linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net'; 谭姝
> (shu.tan@...sung.com)
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2 1/2 RESEND] f2fs: add a new function to support for merging contiguous read
> 
> For better read performance, we add a new function to support for merging contiguous read as the one for write.
> 
> v1-->v2:
>  o add declarations here as Gu Zheng suggested.
>  o use new structure f2fs_bio_info introduced by Jaegeuk Kim.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> Acked-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c  |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |    3 +++
>  fs/f2fs/super.c |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index b4e4c7e..9cf3f6c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -400,6 +400,56 @@ int f2fs_readpage(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +void f2fs_submit_read_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int rw)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_bio_info *io = &sbi->read_io;
> +
> +	if (!io->bio)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&io->io_mutex);
> +	if (io->bio) {
> +		submit_bio(rw, io->bio);
> +		io->bio = NULL;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&io->io_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +void submit_read_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
> +					block_t blk_addr, int rw)
> +{
> +	struct block_device *bdev = sbi->sb->s_bdev;
> +	struct f2fs_bio_info *io = &sbi->read_io;
> +	int bio_blocks;
> +
> +	verify_block_addr(sbi, blk_addr);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&io->io_mutex);
> +
> +	if (io->bio && io->last_block_in_bio != blk_addr - 1) {
> +		submit_bio(rw, io->bio);
> +		io->bio = NULL;
> +	}
> +alloc_new:
> +	if (io->bio == NULL) {
> +		bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
> +		io->bio = f2fs_bio_alloc(bdev, bio_blocks);
> +		io->bio->bi_sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(sbi, blk_addr);
> +		io->bio->bi_end_io = read_end_io;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (bio_add_page(io->bio, page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, 0) <
> +							PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> +		submit_bio(rw, io->bio);
> +		io->bio = NULL;
> +		goto alloc_new;
> +	}
> +
> +	io->last_block_in_bio = blk_addr;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&io->io_mutex);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * This function should be used by the data read flow only where it
>   * does not check the "create" flag that indicates block allocation.
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index a54fac2..e2cb920 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>  	struct f2fs_sm_info *sm_info;		/* segment manager */
> 
>  	/* for bio operations */
> +	struct f2fs_bio_info read_io;			/* for read bios */
>  	struct f2fs_bio_info write_io[NR_PAGE_TYPE];	/* for write bios */
> 
>  	/* for checkpoint */
> @@ -1118,6 +1119,8 @@ struct page *find_data_page(struct inode *, pgoff_t, bool);
>  struct page *get_lock_data_page(struct inode *, pgoff_t);
>  struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *, struct page *, pgoff_t, bool);
>  int f2fs_readpage(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *, block_t, int);
> +void f2fs_submit_read_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *, int);
> +void submit_read_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *, block_t, int);
>  int do_write_data_page(struct page *);
> 
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 344fb86..6d78fff 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -876,6 +876,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  	sbi->por_doing = false;
>  	spin_lock_init(&sbi->stat_lock);
> 
> +	mutex_init(&sbi->read_io.io_mutex);
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_PAGE_TYPE; i++)
>  		mutex_init(&sbi->write_io[i].io_mutex);
> 
> --
> 1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/