[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528C625A.4040509@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:18:50 +0100
From: Antti Miettinen <amiettinen@...dia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"davidlohr@...com" <davidlohr@...com>,
"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"kzak@...hat.com" <kzak@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: partitions: efi: Fix bound check
On 20.11.2013 02:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:14:22 +0200 (EET) Antti P Miettinen
> <amiettinen@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> > Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof to get proper max for label
> > length.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antti P Miettinen <amiettinen@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
> > Tested-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
>
> When fixing a bug, please provide a description of the user-visible
> impact of that bug. This is so that others can decide which kernel
> version(s) need the patch.
>
> Hiroshi Doyu tested this patch, so I assume there was some observable
> misbehaviour to test. Please fully describe that.
Since this is just a read out of bounds it's not that bad, but the
problem becomes user-visible e.g. if one tries to use
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA, at least with some
enhancements from Hiroshi. Of course the destination array can contain
garbage when we read beyond the end of source array so that would be
another user-visible problem.
Should I send a new version with better commit message?
--Antti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists