[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131120162745.GA5831@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:27:45 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] staging/lustre/lnet: Fix assert on empty group in
selftest module
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:23:43PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> >> From: Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>
> >>
> >> The core of the issue is that the selftest module doesn't sanitize its
> >> own API, but it depends on lst utility to do such checks. As a result
> >> this issue manifests itself in this particular LU through an assert
> >> on an empty group. If the NID is misspelled then an empty group is
> >> added. An error output is provided, but if that's never checked in a
> >> batch script, as is the case with this issue, then the script will try
> >> to add an empty group to a test to run in a batch, and that will cause
> >> an assert
> >>
> >> The fix is two fold. Ensure that lst utility checks that a group is
> >> added with at least one node. If not the group is subsequently
> >> deleted. And the add_test command would fail, since the group no
> >> longer exists.
> >>
> >> The second fix is to ensure that the kernel module itself sanitizes
> >> its own API in this particular case, so that if a different utility is
> >> used other than lst to communicate with the selftest kernel module
> >> then this error would be caught. This fix looks up the batch and the
> >> groups, src and dst, in the ioctl handle and sanitizes that input at
> >> this point. If the group looked up either doesn't exist or doesn't
> >> have at least one ACTIVE node, then the command fails.
> >>
> >> NOTE:there are many other cases in the code where the selftest kernel
> >> module doesn't check for sanity of the input, but depends totally on
> >> the lst module to do such checks. Particularly around length of
> >> strings passed in. Thus it is possible to crash the selftest module
> >> if someone tries to create another userspace app to communicate with
> >> the selftest kernel module without ensuring sanity of the params sent
> >> to the kernel module. In effect, it's always assumed that lst is the
> >> front end for selftest and no other front end is to be used.
> >
> > This patch adds build warnings to the kernel build process, so I can't
> > apply it, sorry. Please fix that up before sending it again.
> >
> Hi Greg,
>
> Can you please be explicit about what build warning you saw?
I don't remember what it was at the moment, sorry.
> I tried to reproduce it with gcc version 4.1.2 and 4.6.3 on my
> machine, but didn't see any build warnings with this patch applied.
I have 4.7.3 here, and x86-64. Try that and see what happens.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists