[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528CFEE9.3060108@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:26:49 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
CC: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Switch to sched_clock_register()
On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. Upgrade
>> to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>> registration interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested.
>>
>> arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> Build and run-tested, appears to work.
> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
>
> Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part
> of a bigger conversion series?
If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. Otherwise
we can send it through the tip/timers tree.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists