[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=CaNMmU0wPH+WC5mKHZG1LQ-cSG+BS-oexAHnTuOcHVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:11:47 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use a sane boot frequency when
booting with a mismatched bootloader configuration
On 20 November 2013 20:29, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> wrote:
> With the current governors that we have in upstream, the only one of
> my concern has been userspace governor, but based on your comment
> earlier in the thread, this is considered an non-issue since userspace
> must trigger transition. However, this does put the SoC at risk
> depending on distro and custom governors used.
>
> If the opinion is that we dont care about these, well.. I can end my
> complaints and depend on the stats to tell me if an unknown frequency
> was ever attempted for debug (even though I might personally not be
> too excited about it).
I wouldn't say that I was against this patch, but it looked like we could live
without it as well.. But I also feel that there is some amount of uncertainty
here and specially with userspace governor..
So, just see the patch which I have floated as replacement for few of the
patches we have been talking about..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists