[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528DEA00.7070505@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:09:52 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <JBeulich@...e.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xen/manage: Guard against user-space initiated poweroff
and XenBus.
On 08/11/13 17:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There is a race case where the user does 'poweroff'
> and at the same time the system admin does 'xl shutdown'.
This isn't a Xen-specific problem is it? Wouldn't it be better to fix
this in generic code?
Especially since I don't think this patch actually fixes the race
completely.
> --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
[...]
> @@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ static void shutdown_handler(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
> };
> static struct shutdown_handler *handler;
>
> - if (shutting_down != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
> + if (atomic_read(&shutting_down) != SHUTDOWN_INVALID)
> return;
In guest initiated poweroff at this time will still race with this
toolstack initiated poweroff.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists