[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131121124926.GB8044@home.goodmis.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:49:26 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a text_poke syscall
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:42:03AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We're talking user space here, which has different requirement (COW,
> memory protection, ...) which means it is not really the same code. You
> can't take a page fault while patching the kernel.
Well, technically you can take a page fault while patching the kernel. It
happens all the time when patching modules (vmalloc'd).
But I get your point. You don't have to worry about COW or being paged
out. "page fault" is just too general of a term. And yes, I'm being anal ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists