linux-kernel - Re: commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 regresses MMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131121125836.GB24559@saruman.home>
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:58:36 -0600
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	<lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 regresses MMC

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:49:11AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:48:41PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> > actually, I didn't miss you at all. your broonie@...aro.org was in Cc
> > of original email thread. The same email which was used to sign-off on
> > original commit.
> 
> It's not what's advertised in MAINTAINERS, you should be sending stuff
> to that address.  My work account is completely separate and for various
> reasons (including the fact that a lot of the mails for upstream sent
> there are duplicates of mails sent here) non-automatic upstream stuff
> has a good chance of getting dropped on the floor and at the very least
> will be dealt with more slowly.

still, your claim that I didn't Cc any maintainer is completely bogus

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)