[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385041249-7705-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:40:37 +0200
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: <swarren@...dia.com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<swarren@...dotorg.org>, <robherring2@...il.com>, <joro@...tes.org>
CC: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv6 01/13] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()
The following pattern of code is tempting to add a new member for
of_property_for_each_*() family as an idiom.
for (i = 0;
!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
<do something with "args">;
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
---
v5:
New patch for v5.
---
include/linux/of.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 276c546..131fef5 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct device_node *np,
s; \
s = of_prop_next_string(prop, s))
+#define of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args) \
+ for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
+
#if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE)
extern void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *, struct proc_dir_entry *);
extern void proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct property *prop);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists