linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] locks: consolidate checks for compatible filp->f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:35:34 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nfs-ganesha-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] locks: consolidate checks for compatible
 filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:45:02AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Add a wrapper around assign_type that does this instead of duplicating
> this check in two places. This also fixes a minor wart in the code where
> we continue referring to the struct flock after converting it to struct
> file_lock.

I don't think posix_assign_type is a good name for this helper, but
as Bruce already pointed out more work is required in that area anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/