lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:52:30 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/9] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()

On 11/21/2013 10:20 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote @ Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:56:49 +0100:
> 
>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:12:18 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:43:28 +0100
>>> Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:05 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com> wrote:
>>>>> The following pattern of code is tempting:
>>>>>
>>>>>   for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
>>>>
>>>> That's a very minimal commit message. Can you elaborate please.
>>>
>>> The above can be:
>>>
>>> "
>>>   The following pattern of code is tempting to add a new member for
>>>   of_property_for_each_*() family as an idiom.
>>>   
>>>     for (i = 0;
>>>         !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
>>>                   <do something with "args">;
>>> "
>>
>> I really do like commit messages to be full enough that a future reader
>> can figure out why a patch was written. ie:
> 
> Updated as:
> 
>   [PATCHv6+ 01/13] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()
>     http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2013-November/007063.html
> 
> This doesn't depend on anything and this can be merged
> independetly. Thanks for your help.

Well, that patch doesn't depend /on/ anything, but something in the rest
of the series does depend /on it/. As such, this patch can't be merged
completely independently; it has to either:

a) Go into whatever branch the rest of the series goes into.

b) Go into a topic branch in the DT tree, which is then both merged into
the main/regular DT tree /and/ used as a base for the rest of this series.

Dependencies work two ways!

(That is, unless this 1 patch gets merged into 3.14, and the rest of
series doesn't get merged until 3.15. In that case, we can ignore the
dependencies).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ