lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385064722.12107.1.camel@x230>
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:12:05 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	"isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com" <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"matt.fleming@...el.com" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	"jlee@...e.com" <jlee@...e.com>,
	"matt@...sole-pimps.org" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
	"cxie@...hat.com" <cxie@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: add no_bricked_efi whitelist

On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 18:35 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

> Remaining space is free space that can be used by efi variable. But by 5KB
> threshold, we cannot use the space while running OS.

Is the situation something like(assuming a 128KB flash part):

1) 64KB of variables, 59KB of deleted variables, 5KB of free space,

or

2) 123KB of variables, 5KB of free space

?
-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ