[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131121205050.GF14725@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:50:50 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 regresses MMC
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:27:06PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> If you have one email address listed in MAINTAINERS, and do all your
> actual work with another identity, you might want to look at your
> workflow a bit. I suggest either signing off with the MAINTAINERS
The only thing that uses the work address is patches and signoffs, all
my e-mail traffic is done from my kernel.org address (including patch
posts).
> email address, or changing the entries of that file. People should
> expect to be able to email you on the address you sign off with.
Unfortunately my employer can't cope with that at present and I don't
really want to use my work address for everything since all the stuff
from upstream DoSs the stuff that pays the bills. I wouldn't mind if
people mailed both, but if you're going to pick a single one then the
one listed in MAINTAINERS is the way forwards (which generally is the
address people manage to pick).
/me notes that he'd probably have been less grumpy if the message had
a subject line that had content in it, even had it gone to the right
mailbox there's a good chance I'd never even have opened the mail due to
that - if anything it going to the wrong place actually worked around
the subject line here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists