linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/probes: Fix basic print type functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <528F115A.8020602@hitachi.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:10:02 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/probes: Fix basic print type functions

(2013/11/22 15:05), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> 
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:22:45 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 11/18, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8 , "%x", unsigned char)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned short)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%x", unsigned int)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8,  "%d", signed char)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", short)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%d", int)
>>> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
>>>  DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%llx", unsigned long long)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d", int)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", int)
>>> -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%ld", long)
>>>  DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%lld", long long)
>>> +#else /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%lx", unsigned long)
>>> +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%ld", long)
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I must have missed something... Not only I do not understand why
>> do we need "#if BITS_PER_LONG", I can't understand why
>> DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC() needs "cast" argument.
>>
>> IOW, how about the patch below instead?
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Masami, did you have any issue regarding the casts?

Hm, unless compiler doesn't complain about it,I'm OK for that.
And as far as I tested on x86/x86-64/arm(32), this has no problem. :)

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>

Thank you!

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/