| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131122092606.GA7817@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:26:06 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Cc: "rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: ds1511: add device-tree bindings
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 07:16:39AM +0000, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> Compatible with ds1500, ds1501 and ds1511
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/maxim-ds1511.txt | 18 +++++
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/maxim-ds1511.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/maxim-ds1511.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/maxim-ds1511.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..17fa356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/maxim-ds1511.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +* Maxim Real Time Clock
> +
> +
> +Support for Maxim DS1500, DS1501 and DS1511 RTC.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Should be "maxim,ds1500-rtc", "maxim,ds1501-rtc" or "maxim,ds1511-rtc".
I'd prefer each of these on an individial line:
- compatible : Should contain one of:
* "maxim,ds1500-rtc"
* "maxim,ds1501-rtc"
* "maxim,ds1511-rtc"
It would also be nice to have a description of how these differ, if
possible.
> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> + region.
> +- interrupts: IRQ line for the RTC.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +rtc@...00 {
> + compatible = "maxim,ds1511-rtc";
> + reg = <0xd0010300 0x20>;
> + interrupts = <50>;
> +};
Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c
> index 6a3fcfe..3778a8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> #define DRV_VERSION "0.6"
>
> @@ -476,6 +479,52 @@ static struct bin_attribute ds1511_nvram_attr = {
> .write = ds1511_nvram_write,
> };
>
> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int ds1511_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct rtc_plat_data *pdata)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> + struct resource res;
> +
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(&pdev->dev.of_node, 0, &res);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
You can use platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0) here as the
platform bus OF code will have already parsed this out of the dt for
you.
> + pdata->size = resource_size(&res);
> +
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res.start, pdata->size,
> + pdev->name))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + ds1511_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res.start, pdata->size);
> + if (!ds1511_base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pdata->ioaddr = ds1511_base;
> + pdata->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(&pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
Similarly, platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0).
There's no need to parse the dt twice.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rtc_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "maxim,ds1500-rtc" },
> + { .compatible = "maxim,ds1501-rtc" },
> + { .compatible = "maxim,ds1511-rtc" },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rtc_of_match);
> +
> +#else
> +static int ds1511_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct rtc_plat_data *pdata)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int ds1511_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct rtc_device *rtc;
> @@ -483,22 +532,31 @@ static int ds1511_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct rtc_plat_data *pdata;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - if (!res) {
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pdata)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - pdata->size = resource_size(res);
> - if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, pdata->size,
> - pdev->name))
> - return -EBUSY;
> - ds1511_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, pdata->size);
> - if (!ds1511_base)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - pdata->ioaddr = ds1511_base;
> - pdata->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
As the platform bus OF code parses everything for you, this should have
been sufficient (with the rtc_of_match table wired up).
> +
> + if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> + ret = ds1511_of_probe(pdev, pdata);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + } else if (!pdev) {
You've already dereferenced pdev above, if this is necessary it's
broken.
How would this get called without a pdev? I believe it can't.
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res) {
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + pdata->size = resource_size(res);
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, pdata->size,
> + pdev->name))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + ds1511_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start, pdata->size);
> + if (!ds1511_base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + pdata->ioaddr = ds1511_base;
> + pdata->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
This all relies on pdev despite only being called when pdev is NULL, so
it's broken.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists