[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528F7FE5.3020908@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:01:41 -0600
From: Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <benoit.cousson@...aro.org>,
<santosh.shilimkar@...com>, <jgchunter@...il.com>, <rnayak@...com>,
<balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ARM: OMAP: Move public portion of dmtimer.h to include/linux/omap-timer.h
On 11/22/2013 09:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com> [131121 18:00]:
>> Multiplatform support has made arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/ inaccessible to
>> drivers outside the plat-omap directory [1]. Due to this the following drivers
>> are disabled with !CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM:
>> CONFIG_IR_RX51 (drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c)
>> CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE (drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/dsp-clock.c)
>>
>> We move the portion of the dmtimer "API" that should be accessible to the
>> drivers, into include/linux/omap-timer.h
>
> As we chatted earlier, we don't have to expose all these hardware specific
> functions and use existing Linux generic frameworks instead.
>
> We can implement an irqchip and a clocksource in the dmtimer code for the
> client drivers to use, and after that we only have a couple of dmtimer
> specific functions left to export.
>
> I'm thinkging some thing like this for the public API:
>
> omap_dm_timer_request request_irq
> omap_dm_timer_request_specific request_irq
> omap_dm_timer_get_irq request_irq
> omap_dm_timer_set_source clk_set_rate
> omap_dm_timer_stop disable_irq
> omap_dm_timer_start enable_irq
> omap_dm_timer_disable disable_irq
> omap_dm_timer_free free_irq
> omap_dm_timer_set_int_enable enable_irq
Hi Tony,
The thing I feel we're trying to fit a square peg into round hole type of thing
here.
Some reasons I feel this is overkill (point 2 makes it even not possible):
1. Ideally IR_RX51 should be using clockevents/hrtimer framework instead of
irqchip. Other than that, dsp bridge is the only other user.
2. These functions will be also be required to be public once mach-omap2/timer.c
moves to drivers/clocksource/ . At such an early point of code, we can't use
irqchip anyway so we'd need these functions public.
3. This is a minor point, but its also not immediately intuitive or clear to
someone who needs a dedicated hardware timer that they need to use an IRQ chip
driver for the same. But we can avoid any discussion about this till we can
discuss/agree on the above 2.
thanks,
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists