lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131122163132.GB17344@MrMyself>
Date:	Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:31:32 +0800
From:	Nicolin Chen <b42378@...escale.com>
To:	<vinod.koul@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, <timur@...i.org>, <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add dual-fifo mode support of i.MX ssi

Hi all,

   I'm sorry to push this. But this series has been an orphan for a while.
   Could any one please receive and foster it?

Thank you.
Nicolin Chen

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:55:23PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>  * ! This series of patches has a direct dependency between them. When
>  * ! applying them, we need to apply to one single branch. Otherwise,
>  * ! it would break currect branches.
> 
> Changelog
> v7:
>  * Appended missing Acked-by to all four patches.
>  * Sorry that I didn't add them at the first place.
> v6:
>  * PATCH-1: Use goto err_firmware instead of return directly.
>  *
>  * Nothing changes for the other three ack-ed patches
> v5:
>  * PATCH-3: Add period size constraint when using dual fifo mode
>  *
>  * Nothing changes for the other three patches
> v4:
>  * PATCH-3: Drop useless register configuration.
>  *
>  * Nothing changes for the other three patches
> v3:
>  * PATCH-1: Add comments to indicate the end of v1 and v2 array.
>  * PATCH-3: Use better way to keep watermark as even number.
>  *
>  * Nothing changes for PATCH-2 and PATCH-4
> v2:
>  * Instead of adding rogue scripts to current SDMA driver based on firmware
>  * V1, we define the new SDMA firmware as version 2 and bisect the PATCH-1
>  * to two patches: The first is to add version check code to the SDMA driver;
>  * And the second is to add SSI dual FIFO DMATYPE.
>  *
>  * Nothing changes for the last two patches.
> v1:
>  * SSI can reduce hardware overrun/underrun possibility when using dual
>  * fifo mode. To support this mode, we need to first update sdma sciprt
>  * list, and then enable dual fifo BIT in SSI driver, and last update DT
>  * bindings of i.MX series.
> 
> Nicolin Chen (4):
>   dma: imx-sdma: Add sdma firmware version 2 support
>   dma: imx-sdma: Add new dma type for ssi dual fifo script
>   ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add dual fifo mode support
>   ARM: dts: imx: use dual-fifo sdma script for ssi
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-imx-sdma.txt       |  1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi                       |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi                       |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi                     | 12 +++++-----
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl.dtsi                      | 12 +++++-----
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c                             | 19 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-imx-sdma.h         |  5 ++++
>  include/linux/platform_data/dma-imx.h              |  1 +
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c                            | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  9 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.4
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ