[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528FAF50.10100@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:24:00 +0100
From: Chang <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, nhorman@...driver.com,
davem@...emloft.net
CC: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: set chunk->tsn_gap_acked at the end of cycle
On 11/22/2013 03:27 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 02:49 AM, Chang Xiangzhong wrote:
>> tsn_gap_acked is an important state flag in chunk, which indicates if the
>> chunk has been acked in gap reports before.
> Actually, this bit indicates simply that the chunk has been acked. It
> doesn't state whether it's been acked in a gap report or via cumulative tsn.
Thanks for pointing this out. Sorry for not having made that clear.
>
>> SFR-CACC algorithm depends on this
>> variable. So set this at the end of each iteration, otherwise the SFR-CACC
>> algorithm would never be toggled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chang Xiangzhong <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
>> ---
>> net/sctp/outqueue.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>> index 1b494fa..bff828c 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>> @@ -1396,7 +1396,6 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
>> * while DATA was outstanding).
>> */
>> if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>> - tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
>> if (TSN_lt(*highest_new_tsn_in_sack, tsn))
>> *highest_new_tsn_in_sack = tsn;
>> bytes_acked += sctp_data_size(tchunk);
>> @@ -1460,6 +1459,8 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
>> */
>> list_add_tail(lchunk, &tlist);
>> }
>> +
>> + tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
> The current code will set the state if it hasn't been set yet. Why is
> this needed?
Because in line 1420 ~ 1440 The SFR-CACC algorithms use tsn_gap_acked.
That "if block" would never be triggered because the varaiable's been
set. That's why I move the "state changing sentence" to the end of the
iteration.
> Now there is an issue with tracking highest_new_tsn_in_sack. The spec
> is a little vague on this, but the highest_new_tsn_in_sack only supposed
> to track tsns that have not been resent. If a tsn has been reneged, and
> then sent again, it is not considered 'new' thus should not count
> toward highest_new_tsn_in_sack. We currently do not track this right.
I'll try to figure this out.
> -vlad
>
> -vlad
>
>> } else {
>> if (tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>> pr_debug("%s: receiver reneged on data TSN:0x%x\n",
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists