[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <528FB49E.2000502@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:38 -0500
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...e.cz, snanda@...omium.org,
dserrg@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec
(11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
> mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has
> a single user.
It's ok.
but,
> - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag to conform completely to POSIX.
> - * LBT 04.03.94
> + * !PF_FORKNOEXEC check to conform completely to POSIX. LBT 04.03.94.
I guess LBT is his name and !PF_FORKNOEXEC is not his opinion. Please just
remove "LBT 04.03.94" too. git repo still keep his achievement and can avoid
confusion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists