[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131122205640.GA21895@xps8300>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:56:40 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio conversion support
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:40:32AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 05:14 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > All platforms using this driver are now converted to the new
> > descriptor-based GPIO interface.
>
> Don't you want to remove the fields from the pdata structure too, since
> it's pointless to set them anymore IIUC?
Agreed. We should have removed them in this patch.
I have prepared a separate patch where I remove those and some other
unused fields from the pdata structure (attachment). Would it be OK to
add that to this patch set? Or should this patch simply be updated?
--
heikki
View attachment "0001-net-rfkill-gpio-remove-obsolete-fields-from-platform.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (4914 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists